Search for: "Tims v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 1,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2010, 5:00 am by Michael McCann
Tim Epstein will moderate the panel discussion, with Gabe Feldman and me as the panelists.A webcast of the event is available. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:17 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
Pa. 2004) (a case my partner Tim Foley and I defended and prevailed in). [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Tim Wu argues that Monday’s decision in Ohio v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 7:06 am by Drew York
Co-authors: JP Vogel and Tim Fandrey Bill Deron bought a 100-acre tract next to a creek outside the City of Houston. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 8:11 pm by Jeff Gittins
The transferability of shares in a water company is an issue that was raised in the Utah Supreme Court case of Southam v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 9:53 am by Chris Coulter
RETRIEVER SVERIGE In the high profile case of Case-466/12 Svensson & Others v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 8:25 am by Joe May
Peter Harder and Danylo Korbabicz in Lexology Campaign Finance Kansas: “House-Senate panel votes to double campaign donation limits” by Tim Carpenter in The Topeka Capital-Journal State Legislatures Florida: “State Lawmakers Pushing To Extend Legislative Terms” by Nick Evans in WFSU.org Vermont: “Off-session legislative activity causes concern” by Neal Goswami in the Times Argus Washington: “Liias, Ryu selected for leadership posts… [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Wolfgang Demino
As part of Midland Funding's Rule 306a motion, it filed additional affidavits from Midland Funding's staff counsel, including Staley and another lawyer, Tim Elder. [read post]
10 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Wolfgang Demino
As part of Midland Funding's Rule 306a motion, it filed additional affidavits from Midland Funding's staff counsel, including Staley and another lawyer, Tim Elder. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
Indeed, their brief in other places states their opinion that significance testing is not necessary at all: “Testing for significance, however, is often mistaken for a sine qua non of scientific inference. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
  We have provided guidance on this issue for numerous CEQA documents throughout the state. [read post]