Search for: "Tims v. Tims" Results 401 - 420 of 2,071
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2020, 5:00 am by D Daniel Sokol
Standard-Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing—At the Crossroads of Economic Theory and Legal Practice Tim W Dornis The Huawei v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 2:00 pm by Amy Howe
Casey, the 1992 decision reaffirming Roe v. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 6:18 am by Cory Doctorow
Introduction In 1998, Bill Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA), a sweeping overhaul of U.S. copyright law notionally designed to update the system for the digital era. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 2:11 pm by assoulineberlowe
Photo by Tim Mossholder on Pexels.comAmong other things, the Families First Coronavirus Relief Act (FFCRA) provides paid leave to employees to care for a child and paid sick leave. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 4:18 am by James Romoser
She argues that the three cases — Espinoza v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 3:00 am by James Romoser
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:19 am by Schachtman
In talc exposure litigation of ovarian cancer claims, plaintiffs were struggling to show that cosmetic talc use caused ovarian cancer, despite missteps by the defense.[1] And then lawsuit industrialist Mark Lanier entered the fray and offered a meretriciously beguiling move: Stop trying talc cases and start trying asbestos cases. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 6:08 am
Contents include:KJ Keith, Kirby Lecture in International Law 2019: New Zealand, Australia and International Human Rights: 1919–2019 Tim McCormack, Siobhain Galea & Daniel Westbury, The Sir Elihu Lauterpacht International Law Lecture 2018: The Development of Humanity as a Constraint on the Conduct of War Christina Voigt, ANZSIL Conference Keynote 2019: Climate Change, the Critical Decade and the Rule of Law Suzanne Zhou & Jonathan Liberman, Public Health, Intellectual… [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 10:33 pm by Jeff Richardson
"  The other big decision this week was in the DACA case Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]