Search for: "U. S. Patent Office"
Results 401 - 420
of 705
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2015, 3:05 pm
The Examiner referred to MPEP 2173.05(u) , which directed the Examiner to reject a claim as indefinite when a trademark was used to identify a product. [read post]
27 May 2015, 3:41 pm
They can prove that the patent is invalid as an affirmative defence, file a declaratory judgment requesting the court to declare the patent invalid (MedImmune v Genetech (2007)), seek inter partes review at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board or seek ex parte rexamination at the Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:08 am
The Examiner referred to MPEP 2173.05(u) , which directed the Examiner to reject a claim as indefinite when a trademark was used to identify a product. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 11:59 am
In a guest post on PatentlyO, Ron Katznelson wrote of the Patent Assertion Entities [PAE] Report, prepared by the President’s Council of Economic Advisers, the National Economic Council, and the Office of Science & Technology Policy:I also show (including through FOIA revelations) that the PAE Report’s secret author, a patent law professor, dominated its content by her own works, and those substantially reflecting her views. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 1:12 pm
The general holding is that a final decision by the US Patent & Trademark Office’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB) can serve as issue preclusion to collaterally estop a court from re-judging already-decided issues. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 5:38 am
Otherwise, here’s hoping for an amicable settlement — after all, it’s just two “U”s put together. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 2:22 pm
Patent No. 8,148,374(“the ’374 patent”). [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 5:35 pm
Carter Ruml of Stites & Harbison on the firm’s blog, Stites on Estates Patenting Stem Cells in View of the USPTO’s New Interim Guidance – Silicon Valley lawyer Antoinette Konski of Foley & Lardner on the firm’s blog, Personalized Medicine Bulletin Patents – Grounded in History, Vital for the Future – Chicago lawyer Richard Beem on his blog, Beem on Patents Newsgathering Drones: Prepare for Takeoff?… [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 8:11 am
U. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 5:00 am
Patent and Trademark Office, the 13th-highest total for any single entity receiving U.S. patents that year. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Our perusal of Canon’s patents issued by the U.S. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 5:00 am
Patent and Trademark Office. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 4:30 am
Canada (Attorney General), 2014 FC 1243 http://t.co/SxCrxjq2we -> Letter of Request in patent case enforced in Arctic Cat Inc. et al. v. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 9:08 am
Darue Engineering & Mfg., 545 U. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 12:05 pm
Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) released its updated 2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility (the “ Interim Eligibility Guidance”) in light of the recent Supreme Court decision in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 5:52 am
UTS allegedly acquired ATO’s assets, including PBT’s assets. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:52 am
Rosetta appealed and applied for a cancellation of Langescheidt’s colour trade mark at the German Trade Mark & Patent Office. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:18 am
Patent [...] [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 4:38 am
Patent and Trademark Office actions relating to software patents have confused and frustrated many patent applicants. [read post]
23 Sep 2014, 10:05 pm
PolkPatent Portfolios [article] 154 U. [read post]
