Search for: "U.S. v. Gray"
Results 401 - 420
of 883
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
14 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm
Trump’s election on the U.S. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 4:43 pm
Gray, and a private individual, Charles J. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm
Further, the Second Circuit has yet to decide Pearson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 5:00 pm
In this case, Kaley v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 4:36 pm
Editor in Chief Parker Howell wrote the third article, “Cheaper Watches and Copyright Law: Navigating ‘Gray Markets’ After the Supreme Court’s Split in Costco v. [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 2:22 pm
Gray. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:25 am
Weinstein of the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 1:23 am
U.S. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:27 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:00 pm
Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court held that “a child born in the U.S. to Chinese parents—who at that time were prohibited from becoming U.S. citizens—was a citizen under the 14th Amendment. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 5:34 pm
Now, either he’s dying those dark locks of hair, or the Italian-stallion in him just keeps the gray away. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 4:23 am
Brosseau, 543 U.S. at 198, nor can it be said that they made a “bad guess[] in [a] gray area[],” cf. [read post]
19 May 2015, 12:01 pm
Denny Walsh of the Sacramento Bee reports on the high court's decision in People v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:43 pm
The case is Port v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm
In Opinion analysis: Justices reject publisher’s claims in gray-market copyright case, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 19, 2013, 12:22 PM), Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog nicely summarizes the ruling, in Plain English: In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:34 am
“ Lozano v. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 5:52 am
., Lartigue v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 5:16 pm
The EEOC's suit (EEOC v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 7:45 am
The recent decision in Murphy v. [read post]
