Search for: "U.S. v. Quinn*"
Results 401 - 420
of 509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2024, 10:58 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 9:04 am
Hyatt, 566 U.S. 431 (2012). [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court ruling Hurst v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 11:51 am
Arguments in Friedrichs v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:28 am
QE's approach of not teaming up with patent attorneys in these types of proceedings is as unusual as it is controversial in the German IP law community, but in the proceedings I watch there is no indication of them being less effective on their own.All three parties (Apple, Google, Microsoft) also dispatched in-house counsel from the United States, which speaks to the significance of this case.The U.S. equivalent of this patent is still at issue in a Motorola v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
The First Amendment prohibits a State’s collecting an agency shop fee from an individual on behalf of an employee organization that the individual does not wish to join or supportHarris v Quinn, USSC #11-681, decided June 30, 2014The U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:33 am
As a result, the Apple v. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 8:44 am
--the U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2019, 1:16 am
In the first Nokia v. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 11:27 am
; and Bender v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:07 am
Crestron Electronics, Inc., 2010 U.S. [read post]
4 Apr 2010, 10:55 am
Costa Crociere, case no. 09-337 in the U.S. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
Top 10 U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2021, 8:23 am
CA) and Monsanto v. [read post]
7 Jan 2009, 1:45 pm
U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 3:41 pm
Greg Garre, a former U.S. solicitor general who represents Florida in this case on the original docket, also takes a seat in the public gallery, not the bar section. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 9:00 pm
North Dakota and other cases, the U.S. [read post]
15 Nov 2017, 9:30 am
Decided in March of this year, Star Athletica v. [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 9:05 pm
Jackson’s concurring opinion in Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
