Search for: "UNIFORM DISTRICT COURT RULES"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,031
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
The Court thus remanded to the district court with instructions to conduct a more rigorous certification analysis. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:00 am
A California federal district court recently denied a motion for class certification because the evidence presented in connection with the motion refuted plaintiffs’ attempted showing of commonality through uniform exposure to unlawful corporate policies. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:27 am
The judges of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan have announced the approval, “on a pilot period basis,” of a Model Order Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information and a Rule 26(f) meet and confer checklist. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 7:27 am
The judges of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan have announced the approval, “on a pilot period basis,” of a Model Order Relating to the Discovery of Electronically Stored Information and a Rule 26(f) meet and confer checklist. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
Below is the question presented to the Court: “Question Presented: When a party proffers expert testimony in support of or in opposition to a motion for class certification, may the district court rely on the testimony in ruling on the motion without conducting a full and conclusive examination of its admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and this Court’s decision in Daubert v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 11:04 am
Below is the question presented to the Court: “Question Presented: When a party proffers expert testimony in support of or in opposition to a motion for class certification, may the district court rely on the testimony in ruling on the motion without conducting a full and conclusive examination of its admissibility under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and this Court’s decision in Daubert v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:14 am
The District Court held that the University did not have a protectable interest in the uniform colors and the painter was permitted to use the colors in his artistic works to accurately depict historic football scenes. [read post]
9 May 2022, 9:00 am
For example, the State of Alabama filed a lawsuit in district court against the United States Census Bureau regarding this new mechanism’s viability. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:00 am
Both parties appealed the district court’s ruling to the 4th Circuit. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 7:04 am
Once we are committed to seeking only eventual uniformity, then it is not a knock-out objection that the rule advanced here allows for disuniformity. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 2:46 pm
The court thought that common issues didn't "predominate" under Rule 23(b)(3) unless the class could prove uniform increases in hospital prices for all services after the merger. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 3:53 pm
Last summer, the Supreme Court ruled in Siegel v. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 11:27 am
While CBE held the air “district’s selected baseline was impermissibly “hypothetical” because it was based on maximum permitted operating conditions that were “not the norm” “(CBE at 322), it also recognized there is no “uniform, inflexible rule” and agencies have discretion to devise a baseline that accommodates fluctuating operating conditions as long as it is supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 5:57 am
California’s Government Code section 68070 authorizes the Judicial Council to adopt rules “to provide for uniformity” including, but not limited to, “rules relating to law and motion. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed a district court holding that this rule was not properly promulgated, the Environmental Protection Agency and U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 10:00 am
That inquiry is a core part of determining whether an anti-SLAPP motion should be granted.Last week, the district court once again ruled in A-B's favor and found it demonstrated such a probability of success, thereby denying Clark's anti-SLAPP motion for a second time. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 2:52 pm
Frequent readers will recall that I really, really like the website of the District of Arizona Bankruptcy Court. [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 9:24 am
On October 17, 2012, the Second District (Division 4) published its class certification opinion in Ayala v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 8:22 am
The busy court is already swamped with criminal matters, and getting a trial date in an eviction case can take upwards of several months — certainly not “just, speedy and inexpensive” as mandated by the Uniform Summary Process Rules. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 9:07 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) addressed this type of situation. [read post]
