Search for: "US v. Jordan" Results 401 - 420 of 1,386
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2010, 6:53 am by James Bickford
  Prominent among the docketed cases is Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 7:25 pm
Jordan Myers, Learning to Live with Jones v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
” Briefly: At Bloomberg Law’s Cases and Controversies podcast, “Kimberly Robinson and Jordan Rubin break down the 5-4 decision in Herrera v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
| 3-D Lego trade mark | Garcia v Google | B+ subgroup | EU trade mark reform and counterfeits in transit | French v Battistelli | US v Canada over piracy | UK Supreme Court in Starbucks |  BASCA v The Secretary of State for Business | Patent litigation, music, politics | Product placement in Japan.Never too late 50 [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 3:51 am
The floor goes to the CJEU | Is Michael Jordan’s ”Jumpman” logo a copyright infringement? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 2:57 pm by Lucy Reed
Below is an article of mine published in Family Law Journal in July of this year, reproduced with kind permission of Jordans. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 4:59 pm
Using such logic, Page would be able to recover against any tenant of the shopping center. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 9:10 pm by Kevin Pitts
 The 5th District Court of Appeals adopted the Crooks standard in Jordan. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 4:28 am by Edith Roberts
” At Lawfare, Steve Vladeck looks at Dalmazzi v. [read post]
11 Aug 2011, 8:39 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Within the nonprecedential decision in PRIVACASH v. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:50 pm
Teva v Gilead, Abraxis v Comptroller and Wobben v Siemens kick of 2017's patent cases | AIPPI (UK) Event: 2016's patent cases - all you really need to know | BREAKING: CJEU rules that EU law does NOT prevent punitive damages in IP cases | Supreme Court rules Act of Parliament is needed to initiate UK leaving the EU | Book review: "From Maimonides to Microsoft: The Jewish Law of Copyright Since the Birth of Print" | Applications for information on… [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 6:38 pm by Donald Thompson
 Further, at least one lower court has reasoned that “[i]t is quite possible that holding the defendant to the five day limitation in these circumstances could violate the defendant’s due process rights” (People v Onyeabor, 8 Misc3d 310, 314, n 10 [Sup Ct Kings Co 2005] citing Santobello v New York, 404 US 257 [1971]).Circumstances giving rise to the filing of what would otherwise be an untimely § 190.50 notice can arise in several ways. [read post]