Search for: "United Reservation Services, LLC" Results 401 - 420 of 641
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2015, 3:12 am
Credit card and reservation records established that customers from across the country patronize the restaurants. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 2:12 pm by Kraft Palmer Davies, PLLC
With the exception of medical billings from Seattle Spine Institute, LLC related to the four surgeries performed by Dr. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:29 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently decided the case of Breton Energy, L.L.C., et al. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 10:51 am
§ 1127 defines use in commerce of a mark as “the bona fide use of a mark in the ordinary course of trade, and not made merely to reserve a right in a mark” (my emphasis) and further states that a service mark is used in commerce  “when it is used or displayed in the sale or advertising of services and the services are rendered in commerce, or the services are rendered in more than one State or in the United States and… [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 2:56 pm by John Elwood
” Recall that in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:43 am by Michael Geist
.***
 February 26, 2015
 NOTICE TO MANAGED NETWORK SYSTEMS ACCOUNT HOLDER
IP ADDRESS xx.xx.xx.xx at 2015-01-31 xx:xx North American Eastern Time
Re: Notice of Unauthorized Use of Copyright Owned by Paperstreet Media LLC, Case #: XXXXX
 This notice is intended solely for the primary Managed Network Systems service account holder.
 CEG TEK International (“CEG”) is the agent for Paperstreet Media LLC (hereinafter… [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am by John Elwood
When an LLC that owned the development borrowed money from the bank, it required the wives of the owners to sign the loan agreement, agreeing to be “primarily and unconditionally liable” for the debt, so the bank could pursue them first, before pursuing the LLC’s owners. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am by Maureen Johnston
Jewell 14-377Issue: (1) Whether the United States Fish and Wildlife Service is obligated, under the Endangered Species Act, to demonstrate how a reasonable and prudent alternative to any federal agency action that is likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a protected species or adversely modify its critical habitat is economically feasible; if so, whether it can ignore the devastating impacts on the human community caused by the alternative's implementation, as the… [read post]