Search for: "United States v. Roof" Results 401 - 420 of 483
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 6:03 am by Guest Blogger
Lumbermens appealed that decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, which ultimately affirmed the District Court’s finding of coverage. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 3:10 pm by carie
"The institution is not going in the direction he thinks it should," he said.That was clear this year when he was on the losing side in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am by Bexis
  The “FDA is a regulatory agency whose mandate is to control which drugs are marketed in the United States and how they are marketed. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 9:48 pm
         Introduction             When thinking about judicial activism, the first thing that comes to mind often is the Supreme Court of the United States making decisions regarding civil rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am by Hilde
”On September 9th last year, Stevens engaged in a classic version of advocacy-by-interrogation during the argument of Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm by Ilya Somin
For years, the site of the property condemned in the controversial Kelo v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 6:44 am by Mark S. Humphreys
This case was decided by the United States District Court, Northern District, Dallas Division. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 8:00 am by Mark S. Humphreys
Walker filed an appeal in the United States Fifth Circuit, which is the case written about here. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]