Search for: "United States v. Steven Stands" Results 401 - 420 of 836
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 May 2017, 12:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
The proposed constitutional amendment is one sentence: “The Congress shall have power to prohibit the physical desecration of the flag of the United States. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although Texas seeks to use the law and the litigation over it as a vehicle for overturning Roe v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:15 am
Hopkins, UNITED STATES: TAKING A STAND (OR NOT): NEW ETHICS RULE COULD COMPROMISE YOUR EXPERT'S TESTIMONY, Mondaq Article ID: 48664***David I. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:26 pm by Robert Cottrol - Guest
  Men who had helped save the Union while in the ranks of the United States Colored Troops, were to be defenseless against their former enemies previously clad in Confederate Gray, now wearing the robes of the Ku Klux Klan. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 12:42 pm
United States, 137 U. [read post]
5 May 2013, 12:15 pm by Schachtman
Sanders argues that the Milward opinion is important because it highlights what he characterizes as a “rhetorical conflict that has been ongoing, often below the surface, since the United States Supreme Court’s 1993 opinion in Daubert v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 1:00 pm
Supreme Court - Anthony Kennedy - United States - Justice Kennedy - Government [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 6:54 am by Stephen Wermiel
Justice John Paul Stevens explained his standpoint clearly in a dissent in Citizens United v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 7:48 pm
The defendant's privacy interests in the Blazer is as the United States Supreme Court recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 12:40 pm by Jordan Brunner, Chris Mirasola
Lastly, Wilkinson argued that the fact that Al Qaeda declared war on the United States should be given little weight. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am by Michael C. Dorf
It then also notes that the plaintiffs and the United States as amicus had connected the abortion right to the right of consenting adults to engage in same-sex sexual conduct (recognized in Lawrence v. [read post]
31 Oct 2022, 11:40 pm by Josh Blackman
I've now had a chance to review the oral argument in the Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
At USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the case, which will be argued on Wednesday, “could go a long way toward reversing abortion rights in the United States[:] Whether they ultimately revert by four years or 47 remains to be seen. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 6:43 am by Adam J. White
Instead, he need only say, ‘The United States changed its mind. [read post]