Search for: "United States v. Vigil"
Results 401 - 420
of 491
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved the first oral contraceptive available in the United States without a prescription. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
” (United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2024, 6:45 am
Chernov v. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 4:13 am
This article from the New York Times ($) summarises the position in the United States. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 3:16 pm
Attorney for the Southern District of Florida; John V. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 5:28 pm
Enforcement targets must nevertheless be vigilant. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 8:39 am
A stop in this circumstance can be contested with the Fourth Amendment of the United Stated Constitution which protects its citizens “against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]
1 May 2016, 4:02 pm
On the same day HHJ Moloney QC heard a PTR in the case of Ghuman v Ghuman. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
In the process, these changes have saved lives here in the United States and abroad, and prevented countless injuries. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 3:46 am
Remember Buck v. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 2:05 pm
In the United States, trademark rights are acquired through exclusive, continuous use, not registration. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 9:25 am
Mark Rothko (1903-1970) is a central figure in Abstract Expressionism, a movement that emerged in the United States during the 1940s and 1950s. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 5:38 am
Ohio) in Sullivan v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 10:00 pm
In Caminiti v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
Research indicates that the decision in Shamil Bank v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 11:03 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit—whose decisions bind Colorado's school districts—has likewise made clear that any forecast of substantial disruption must rest on a "concrete threat" of substantial disruption. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 9:36 am
V. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:29 am
However, it was also the rule of law that advanced religious freedom in Canada (in the 1959 Supreme Court of Canada decision in Roncarelli v. [read post]
