Search for: "Vigil v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 550
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2011, 6:36 am by Schachtman
INS, 240 F.3d 642, 645 n.7 (7th Cir. 2001) (Nazi deportation); United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 3:50 pm
The rule from that case has been adopted into the law across the United States, and it is now the basis for section 351 of the Restatement (2d) of Contracts. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 8:02 am by Chris Castle
  In many countries of the world outside of the United States, a “database right” exists in computer databases of information as a property right separate and apart from copyright. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 6:49 am
The Bottom Line: The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of South Carolina in In re Barnwell County Hospital, No. 11-06207 (Bankr. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:42 pm by Jasmine Joseph
A version of that right is entrenched in the constitutional law of the United States: the right of every human being – again, without exception – not to be subjected to any punishment that is “cruel and unusual”. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 4:12 am by Maxwell Kennerly
United States opinion last Thursday: On May 16, 2003, Solorzano Arroyo went into labor. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 2:00 am by Kara OBrien
An investor who accumulates sufficient ETF Shares to comprise a Creation Unit may have the Creation Unit redeemed by the ETF under limited circumstances. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 8:02 am by admin
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:00 pm by John Bellinger
”   In closing, the panel — almost as an afterthought, and with scant analysis — slams the door on two other defense arguments that have been litigated at length in other courts: that the ATS does not apply to activities outside the United States and that ATS plaintiffs must first exhaust local remedies. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 1:36 pm by smiplaw
Abbot’s patent ‘551 was found to be unenforceable by the District Court, because Abbot failed to disclose to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) a brief filed with the European Patent Office (EPO) regarding an earlier patent, U.S. [read post]