Search for: "WAGNER v STATE"
Results 401 - 420
of 774
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2013, 7:38 am
This flows from the SCC decisions in Ontario (AG) v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 8:34 pm
While covering these events, my blog has been inundated with comments expressing outrage at FDA and state regulators for raw milk cheese “crackdowns. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 7:21 pm
In Duran v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 9:22 am
Beyond is an entity set up by Paul Wagner. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question here, though, was whether the bedroom tax policy is “manifestly without reasonable foundation” because the bedroom tax involved a question of high policy – the Secretary of State relied on Humphreys v HMRC [2012] 1 WLR 1545, which, in turn, had applied Stec v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017 to argue for a different test depending on the ground of discrimination and the type of policy. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:14 am
JOHN a/k/a TRINITY POPE v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 4:46 pm
”); Wagner v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 2:49 am
On November 12, 2013, the United States District Court for the Northern District of California is scheduled to commence a limited damages retrial in the first Apple v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 3:54 am
Where the contract contemplates the exercise of discretion, this pledge includes a promise not to act arbitrarily or irrationally in exercising that discretion (see, Tedeschi v Wagner Coll., 49 N.Y.2d 652, 659). [read post]
11 Jun 2013, 1:07 pm
Earthjustice attorney and director of international programs Martin Wagner said, "Transparency and public participation are hallmarks of democracy. [read post]
3 May 2013, 9:50 am
Tompkins and United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 6:41 pm
Bohling and then reinforced in 2004 in State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 9:44 am
Wagner, Gerhard. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 4:00 am
Awad v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 10:15 am
V. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 6:27 pm
Wagner). [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 9:14 am
Smith, J., concurring)The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial (Wagner, D.J.) of a California state prisoner's § 2254 petition. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:51 am
It was thought that everyone was on the same team, even though it was clear from disclosures and other communications that the lawyer hired by the carrier was the lawyer for the carrier.This assumption was, and is, erroneous.As reported this morning in WorkCompCentral news, a pair of state supreme court cases from Montana and Texas are making a distinction between counsel for the carrier, the administrator, and the employer.Texas Supreme Court's decision last June in In Re XL Specialty… [read post]
