Search for: "Williams v. Office of Public Defender"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Durand v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Williams, 967 So. 2d941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Williams, 967 So. 2d941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 3:55 pm
Williams, 967 So. 2d941 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007); State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
(As he himself notes, he in effect put aside the work he had been doing in in order to delve into the world of the internet, including copyright and the implications of the new social media, where he became one of the ranking academics and public intellectuals. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And even before the Amendment many women were more or less protected against sexual discrimination in voting in many U.S. states, especially those in the far West.)As the dean of its flagship public law school, I am proud that Illinois was the very first state to ratify the suffrage-and-sex amendment. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And let’s not forget the indictment and plea agreement of Trump’s former personal lawyer Michael Cohen, which proclaimed that Cohen paid hush money “at the direction of a candidate for public office”―unidentified, but in context clearly referring to Trump―to forestall public allegations that Trump engaged in two extramarital affairs. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
The bar section and the public gallery are pretty full today. [read post]
23 May 2019, 5:46 pm
Williams (2008)). [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
And then it purports to apply the rule in a way that I criticize, and that none of the critics defend. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:00 am
William Harris, as Administrator of the Estate of Lillie Michelet v. [read post]
19 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Indeed, in Gratz v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 12:56 pm
Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:47 am
They trace this clear statement rule primarily to a 1992 Supreme Court case—Franklin v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 2:12 pm
Watkins, “holding that religious tests may not be used to decide who holds public office” Engel v. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
9 May 2019, 4:00 am
Initially, respondent argues that certain of petitioner’s allegations allege a binding past practice and that such claims are within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Public Employment Relations Board. [read post]
