Search for: "Word v. Jones"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,706
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
Employees’ Take Away The written word may well not be the last word on the definition of one’s privacy rights. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:20 am
Employees’ Take Away The written word may well not be the last word on the definition of one’s privacy rights. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 2:46 pm
Alfonso Ribeiro, who played Carlton Banks in the Fresh Prince of Bel-Air, performed the dance to the Tom Jones song “It’s Not Unusual” during an episode of the show. [read post]
23 Feb 2019, 8:46 am
Coda Dev. s.r.o. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The words we use provide a filter through which we view and acknowledge legal concepts. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
” Bob Jones University v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
The list may also be accessed HERE (pdf and also word searchable). [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 4:17 am
Corp., 137 AD3d 1252, 1254, quoting Mirzoeff v Nagar, 52 AD3d 789, 789; see Matter of Chana J.A. v Barry S., 135 AD3d 743, 744; Walter v Jones, Sledzik, Garneau & Nardone, LLP, 67 AD3d 671, 672). [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
United States, 17-6054, Jones v. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 1:31 am
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court Ms Stocker sought permission to appeal to the Supreme Court – and on 9 July 2018 Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs granted the permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal to dismiss her appeal from the judgment of Mitting J. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am
Permission to appeal to the Supreme Court Ms Stocker sought permission to appeal to the Supreme Court – and on 9 July 2018 Lord Kerr, Lord Lloyd-Jones and Lord Briggs granted the permission to appeal the decision of the Court of Appeal to dismiss her appeal from the judgment of Mitting J. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:58 pm
UPDATE: Texas Supreme Court denied review 5/24/2019 CLAIM-FRACTURING CUM APPELLATE GALORE Natgasoline LLC v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
(relisted after the May 17 conference; rescheduled before the March 2, March 16, March 23, March 29, April 13, April 20, April 27, May 10, May 24, May 31, June 7, June 14, June 21, September 24, October 5, October 12, October 26, November 2, November 9, November 16, November 30, December 7 and January 4 conferences) Jones v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
In a word, yes. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:48 pm
We’ll see whether this becomes the first gun-rights case the court takes up in many years or whether the Second Amendment remains (in Justice Clarence Thomas’ words) “a disfavored right in this Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 2:16 pm
Episode 245 of the Cyberlaw PodcastNate Jones, David Kris, and I kick off 2019 with a roundup of the month of news since we took our Christmas break. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 9:19 am
The court provided guidance on how to treat a word that is arguably the dominant portion of a mark and, in particular, when that word is the subject of a registration by another party. [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization representing… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 4:08 pm
Magazine ($4.6m including economic loss, later reduced by $3.9m), Wagners v Alan Jones ($3.7m) and now Rush v Daily Telegraph (judgment reserved) are not the whole story. [read post]
