Search for: "Word v. U.s"
Results 401 - 420
of 17,919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2015, 10:49 am
Patents, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 11:44 am
Or to use the words of Judge O'Scannlain, "I dissent for the narrow purpose of sending the criminal defense bar this message: do not cite this case for the proposition that Paul's sentence was substantively unreasonable. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:05 am
Judge Tallman finds -- in a quite well-written opinion -- that there's a qualitative difference between (1) forthrightly admitting to the police that you have cocaine in a closed container, which suffices to waive your Fourth Amendment privacy expectations, and (2) using secret code words in a jailhouse telephone call that you know is monitored in the hope that your confederate can dispose of some evidence, which does not.But Judge Tallman then concludes the opinion by hinting to the… [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 4:45 am
” U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
Siegel (U.S. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:14 pm
Wade but also Griswold v. [read post]
26 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm
Mazzuca, 2011 WL 65759, in which U.S. [read post]
17 May 2012, 9:28 am
While Brown is still widely celebrated as the “crown jewel of the U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
Last week’s Supreme Court oral argument in Moore v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Even if you take negotiators' word that they're hewing close to U.S. law, they're still engaging in what Kaminski has elsewhere dubbed “regulatory paraphrasing”: because they're not transcribing U.S. law verbatim, they're necessarily making interpretations. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am
Lando, 441 U.S. 153, 157 & n.1 (1979); Garrison v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 3:33 pm
(U.S. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 12:50 pm
(U.S. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:00 pm
CATTERSON, CLERK U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2011, 8:53 am
This is, of course, precisely what the U.S. government, as the plaintiff in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 1:22 pm
Davis Bournonville Co., 270 U.S. 390 (1926) Syllabus 1. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 11:38 am
That doctrine interprets Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 10:31 am
See eg., Ortega v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 9:56 am
Actually, in this case, a little over 3000 words. [read post]
