Search for: "v. Davis et al" Results 401 - 420 of 642
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2009, 9:00 pm
Kellam, et al.,, _  F.3d _ (4th Cir., June 3, 2009). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:10 pm by Social Sciences Faculty Librarian
‘The absorption of research knowledge by public civil servants’ by Mathieu Ouimet…[et al.] . [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 4:04 am by Barbara Moreno
Duffy, et. al., The Performance of Repeat Test Takers on the Law School Admission Test: 1994-1995 through 2000-2001 Testing Years (2001). [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 9:10 pm by Social Sciences Faculty Librarian
‘The absorption of research knowledge by public civil servants’ by Mathieu Ouimet…[et al.] . [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 6:58 am
Dickstein Shapiro (Patently-O) ITC: No s 337 violation; investigation terminated in Certain Semiconductor Integration Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same involving complainants LSI and Agere (ITC 337 Law Blog) Fleshing out design patent infringement doctrine: Crocs v ITC (Patently-O)   US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Billingnetwork Patent – Court orders plaintiff to file separate patent suits against each defendant: Billingnetwork… [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm by Stephen Albainy-Jenei
   Association for Molecular Pathology, et al. v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 6:13 am
" The Ninth Circuit announced yesterday that it would delay consideration of a gun rights case, issuing an order in Nordyke et al. v. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:15 am
Don Best Sports, et al., Judge Davis decided that patent claims directed to a "computer" and a "computer storage media" programmed to perform specific functions could be directly infringed in the United States under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
22 May 2012, 11:27 am by William A. Ruskin
Terrabrook Vista Lakes L.P., et al. , Case No. 11-11027 (5/18/12). [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Supreme Court case that decided the presidential election, and by David Boies, who represented former Vice President Al Gore in the same case.The case is Perry et al v. [read post]