Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 4181 - 4200 of 9,055
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
”He added that conservatives had “never trashed a Supreme Court nominee. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 6:02 am by Amy Howe
” At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen discusses a recent redistricting decision by the Florida Supreme Court and the effect of the Court’s decision in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 12:02 pm by Kamran Mirrafati
This split amongst the federal appellate courts sets the stage for a Supreme Court showdown. [read post]
23 May 2022, 9:56 am by Amy Howe
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference last week. [read post]
17 Feb 2006, 8:11 am
This type of litigation is known as "dram shop" litigation, and was formally recognized by the Arizona Supreme Court in 1983. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 12:06 pm by Mike Scarcella
“As the Supreme Court has said, the South has changed,” Rein said in court. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 11:39 am by Lyle Denniston
Over and over again, the Arizona legislature’s lawyer in the Court on Monday, Washington attorney Paul D. [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
In 1988, though, the Supreme Court reversed that conclusion. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:58 am
Some of the most important rights to those accused of criminal offenses in this country are referred to as “Miranda rights” after the conclusion of the 1966 Supreme Court case, Arizona v. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 9:31 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Under the Supreme Court's 2015 analysis in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:50 am
Supreme Court denied certiorari in Chavis v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
EMA and the Arizona campaign-finance cases. [read post]
3 Oct 2014, 7:15 am by Amy Howe
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued the first set of orders from its September 29 Conference, adding eleven new cases to its docket. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 10:18 am by Derek T. Muller
No. 17-35349): "Plaintiff's arguments are foreclosed by Supreme Court precedent. [read post]