Search for: "DOES 1-12"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 28,892
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Oct 2011, 1:25 pm
Does this mean that your “1-year” of the magazine is actually only 10 issues because one of the 11 is a special issue, or is it just an explanation of why these magazines only publish 11 issues per year and not 12? [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 5:19 am
Bryant, FEB11, USSC No. 09–150:Opinion: Sotomayor(1) Statements made when questioned by police are non-testimonial when circumstances objectively indicate that the primary purpose of the interrogation is to enable police assistance to meet an ongoing emergency. (2) The relevant inquiry is not the subjective or actual purpose of the individuals involved in a particular encounter, but rather the objective purpose that reasonable participants would have had, as ascertained from the… [read post]
6 Jan 2013, 2:55 pm
In addition, the insurance company may cancel a personal automobile policy: (1) if the policy has been in effect less than 60 days; or (2) if the insurance company mails to the named insured written notice of the cancellation not later than the 30th day before the effective date of the cancellation, with the cancellation taking effect on any 12-month anniversary of the original effective date of the policy. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 9:46 am
See comment 2(a)(3)-1. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 7:28 am
D–1–GN–21–004179 (Dist. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 1:17 pm
And when does this tax noncompliance intersect with government corruption and fraud? [read post]
10 May 2011, 6:50 am
It does not seem fair that the court would view the length of our marriage as only 3 years when we have been living together as husband and wife for almost 7 1/2 years. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 8:54 pm
” The Section meeting starts at noon, with the program to follow from 12:15 to 1:15 p.m. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 9:40 am
I’ll discuss Part 1 in this blog post, and Part 2 in a follow-up.1. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:07 am
A large employer will be subject to tax penalties if: (1) the employer does not offer to its full-time employees (and their dependents) the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage under an employer-sponsored plan and an employee is eligible for health coverage assistance and enrolls in a State insurance exchange (1/12 of $2,000 per full-time employee in excess of 30 assessed monthly); or (2) the employer does offer minimum… [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 11:37 am
A large employer will be subject to tax penalties if: (1) the employer does not offer to its full-time employees (and their dependents) the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage under an employer-sponsored plan and an employee is eligible for health coverage assistance and enrolls in a State insurance exchange (1/12 of $2,000 per full-time employee in excess of 30 assessed monthly); or (2) the employer does offer minimum essential coverage… [read post]
25 Sep 2012, 12:37 pm
A large employer will be subject to tax penalties if: (1) the employer does not offer to its full-time employees (and their dependents) the opportunity to enroll in minimum essential coverage under an employer-sponsored plan and an employee is eligible for health coverage assistance and enrolls in a State insurance exchange (1/12 of $2,000 per full-time employee in excess of 30 assessed monthly); or (2) the employer does offer minimum essential coverage… [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
Id. at 549, 159 S.E.2d at 12. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am
Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 7:44 pm
Environmental Protection Agency 12-1146Issue: (1) Whether Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 6:17 am
2C:12-1. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 7:15 am
And the reading receives further support from Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 26(b)(1), which allows courts to extend time limits for good cause, except for petitions for permission to appeal. [read post]
10 Aug 2022, 7:20 pm
1. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:15 am
To the extent the Act amends the FMLA, it would seem EFMLA is not an additional 12 weeks of leave. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 4:15 am
To the extent the Act amends the FMLA, it would seem EFMLA is not an additional 12 weeks of leave. [read post]
