Search for: "Mark C. Good"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 5,981
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2012, 7:23 am
(Lin also applied to register the mark JEREMY LIN in connection with the same goods). [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 6:12 am
’This morning the Advocate General answered all this questions quite simply: ‘Where conduct occurs via the internet which is liable to infringe a national trade mark registered in a Member State, Article 5(3) of Regulation No 44/2001 must be interpreted as meaning that it attributes jurisdiction: – to the courts of the Member State in which the trade mark is registered [that's presumably good news for Wintersteiger, which has registered its name as… [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 5:07 am
") (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 4:51 pm
- New Jersey attorney Sandra C. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:55 am
That has a reasonable good chance of succeeding. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
§ 1052(c). [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 10:04 pm
Mark Akrigg, Founder, Project Gutenberg Canada. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 1:35 pm
The good is the enemy of the best here The best is the enemy of the good here [read post]
11 Feb 2012, 3:17 pm
Ramsey: consider TM implications of the mark. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 11:58 pm
Under Section 2(c) of the Trademark Act, no mark shall be registered that, “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular living individual except by his written consent, or the name, signature, or portrait of a deceased President of the United States during the life of his widow, if any, except by the written consent of the widow. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:47 pm
How this might work: good faith. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 2:02 pm
De facto rule: One initial bad, two initials good: can register MC Escher. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:24 am
The other three, including Mark Zuckerberg, have shorter form "employment letters" that are far more streamlined. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Respondent purchased for a prospective Internet clothing business and offered sufficient evidence of demonstrable preparations to succeed in its 4(c)(i) defense. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:45 am
Petitioner raised five grounds for cancellation: that Respondent permits its marks to be used for purposes other than certification (Section 14(5)(C) of the Lanham Act); that respondent does not control use of its marks (Section 14(5)(A)); that respondent discriminates in refusing to certify (Section 14(5)(D)); that the marks are generic for the goods; and that respondent committed fraud on the USPTO in securing the registrations. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:20 pm
And, for good measure, the examiner refuses registration based on 2(a) (false connection) and 2(c) (name of a particular individual), both of which can be overcome by disclosing the connection between BGK Trademark Holdings, LLC and Blue Ivy Carter and providing the required consents. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 9:29 am
Without doing a comprehensive survey, I think that most signatories have a version of either (a) or (c) in their systems. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:37 am
(International Marks). [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 8:44 am
Pappas' comments miss the mark by so much that I have chosen to respond here. [read post]
