Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 4181 - 4200
of 21,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2019, 6:47 am
See Robinson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:20 pm
United States, 523 U.S. 296, 300 (1998) (internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 12:02 am
Bledsoe, 237 Ind. 130, 144 N.E.2d 710 (1957).Several lay witnesses testified concerning Mark's apparent state of mind and actions on his wedding day. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
Authored by Kyle Petersen Last week, in Fisher v. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 9:55 pm
It ruled that Applicant Frisch's Restaurants is entitled to registration of the mark BIG BOY for "tartar sauce and pies" and for "restaurant, drive through and carryout services" for the states of Indiana and Kentucky, and for certain counties in Tennessee and Ohio. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:15 am
If Taylor v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 1:14 pm
By Mark R. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 4:33 pm
(internal quotation marks omitted). [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 5:41 am
Business marked up the base rates charged by the third-party providers in return for the service it provided. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 4:30 am
" United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 4:20 am
In Alcazar v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 3:13 pm
In the sub-headline, the Hatch-Waxman Act is referred to as outdated.KSR v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 2:35 pm
This afternoon the Court granted review in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
In United States Patent And Trademark Office, Et Al., v. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:19 am
In United States Patent And Trademark Office, Et Al., v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
A cross by the side of a public highway marking, for instance, the place where a state trooper perished need not be taken as a statement of governmental support for sectarian beliefs. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 6:18 am
Secondly, the GC had erred in law by stating that the Board of Appeal should have explained the reason why it had not taken into account the EUIPO’s findings in the three previous decisions with regard to the reputation of the earlier marks. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 2:41 am
International Hair Cosmetics Group Pty Ltd v International Hair Cosmetics Limited [2011] FCA 339 [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 6:57 am
SME Steel Contractors, Inc. v. [read post]
