Search for: "Paras v. State" Results 4181 - 4200 of 6,183
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2010, 12:28 pm by NL
On iii) - the date of the works contracts: The LVT had found that the date on which the contract was entered into was 'before the start of the lease' (para 27), but then went on to state that: The Tribunal…also determine that the fact that the contract granted to the Council's Direct Contract section was made before the date of the Lease is irrelevant. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:51 am by Brandon Kain
(Unifund, at para. 74) This trend has continued with the Van Breda Trilogy. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
Tax: Treaties; GAARCanada v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am by Dave
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 4:00 am by Alan Macek
The Court upheld all of the trial judge’s decisions that summary trials were appropriate stating at para 80, that “The existence of conflicting affidavit evidence establishes that there is disagreement among the affiants. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:01 am by Administrator
Wolrige Mahon LLP, 2016 BCCA 471 [Soprema] at para 29). [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 6:48 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Hislop at para 53, and R. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2015, 7:48 pm
Equally, the European Court of Human Rights considers that the principles set out in the preamble to the Convention refers to the Convention as a whole (see,  inter alia , ECHR rulings  Engel and Others v. the Netherlands on June 8, 1976, Klass and Others v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 8:58 am
Dean Foods Co., Case 2:10-cv-00059-JPS, appears at 2010-1 Trade Cases 76,952. [read post]
18 Feb 2023, 7:20 am by Just Security
Williams (@PaulWilliamsDC), Alexandra Koch (@alexandraekoch) and Lilian Waldock The American Servicemembers’ Protection Act and the Dodd Amendment: Shaping United States Engagement with the ICC (Part II) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and Isabelle Glimcher (@IsGlimcher) The Binding Interpretation by the Office of Legal Counsel of the Laws Constraining US Engagement with the ICC (Part III) by Floriane Lavaud (@FlorianeLavaud), Ashika Singh and… [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:54 am by NL
[para 51] To the objection that this leaves the unscrupulous landlord free of penalty, there is the counter view that s.215 is untouched. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 4:54 am by NL
[para 51] To the objection that this leaves the unscrupulous landlord free of penalty, there is the counter view that s.215 is untouched. [read post]