Search for: "Park v State"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 11,296
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
Swope v. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 12:19 pm
In World Wheat Foundation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 6:42 am
The rare en banc vote was 7-5.The case is Francis v. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
Attorney in Utah pursued the case of United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2021, 9:00 pm
Citing a recent decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (Francis v. [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 11:38 am
Let's just say that your are leaving the parking lot of your favorite convenience store. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
22 May 2011, 12:00 pm
R (Cart) v The Upper Tribunal; Eba v Advocate General for Scotland (Scotland); and R (MR (Pakistan)) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 14 – 17 March 2011. [read post]
15 May 2020, 6:41 am
Revocable v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 4:10 pm
Under Commonwealth v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 6:42 am
Park, J.D. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 5:34 am
That authority was Colon v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his… [read post]
14 Nov 2015, 6:56 am
" Here, the payment plaintiff received from the fire company's insurer was for bodily injury damages, and thus the amount of SUM benefits available to plaintiff was properly reduced by that amount (see Weiss v Tri-State Consumer Ins. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
However, said the court, citing Matter of Park v DiNapoli, 123 AD3d 1392; Matter of Walters v DiNapoli, 82 AD3d 1487; and Matter of Rivera v DiNapoli, 78 AD3d 1295, "the issue distills to whether the Retirement System successfully rebutted the heart presumption, which, in turn, required the Retirement System to demonstrate -- through expert medical proof -- that Petitioner's cardiac condition was caused by risk factors other than his… [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 8:00 am
Mochocki, et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
In that case the issue was equal access to a park where monuments were permitted to be erected. [read post]
9 Jan 2016, 5:22 am
Theft of State Pension BenefitsNew York State Comptroller Thomas P. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:45 am
DeCarr that Lisa might be living in a trailer park which is across the street. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 6:57 am
Tahsuda (Indian Child Welfare Act – Constitutionality)State of California v. [read post]
