Search for: "S S V STATE OF MICHIGAN" Results 4181 - 4200 of 6,440
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2011, 7:00 pm by cdw
Pat Quinn is widely expected to either sign or veto legislation within days that would formally abolish the death penalty; The New York Times looks at the cost of automating litigation versus its cost savings – better equipment and software equals markedly fewer lawyers; The SCOTUSBlog looks at least week’s Confrontation Clause decision in Michigan v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 3:02 am by Walter Olson
Lawyers with contingency-fee role in AGs’ carbon campaign join Hagens Berman [Scott Flaherty, American Lawyer; earlier on climate lawyers on contingency fee here and here] Encyclopedia of Libertarianism, 2008, includes entries on urban planning by Mark Pennington and on eminent domain and takings by Karol Boudreaux; California legislature’s $1.5 billion green Christmas tree includes bill “aimed at helping a union looking to organize workers who assemble Tesla electric… [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 5:31 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Michigan (2006), Justice Antonin Scalia wrote an opinion--joined by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 5:56 am by Edith Roberts
At the Notice and Comment blog, David Feder discusses Esquivel-Quintana v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 3:26 am
United States, 346 F.3d 386, 399 (3d Cir.2003) ("[T]he Court in Illinois Council seemed to read Michigan Academy as creating an exception to the channeling requirement of § 405(h) in those cases where no judicial review is available at all. [read post]
25 Feb 2007, 5:37 am
In that case, the Baccarat Fremont Developers asked the Supreme Court for a ruling that the Ninth Circuit was required to issue a "redetermination" in light of Justice Anthony Kennedy's concurring opinion in Rapanos v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:00 pm by Guest Blogger
LD: I would love to see us get rid of the electoral college, but if there’s one part of our beloved Constitution that’s as dysfunctional as the electoral college it’s Article V itself—the Constitution is simply too hard to amend. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 6:24 am
In Jayne Dunnum v Dept of Employee Trust Funds, Wisconsin's Dane County Circuit Court ruled (at page 28) that the new law does not violate the state's "super DOMA" amendment. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 4:13 am by Edith Roberts
At Vox, Richard Hasen considers a threat in Michigan to the viability of independent redistricting commissions, mentioned last term in Rucho v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:26 am by Edith Roberts
” Commentary comes from Rick Hasen, who at his Election Law Blog discusses Michigans request for emergency relief from a district court ruling holding that Michigans attempt to eliminate straight-ticket voting violates the Voting Rights Act. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Marshall saw it as a broad and sweeping power granted to chief executives so they could act mercifully.That case, United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 8:52 am by Harold O'Grady
States have the right to call an Article V convention without the concurrence of the Congress whenever two-thirds of the states wish to participate. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
He played on some great Michigan State teams, where the fans would cheer, "Kill, Bubba, kill. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:53 am
Take, for instance, the Michigan v. [read post]