Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2017, 4:13 am
The court upheld one of the districts but ruled that the district court had employed the wrong standard in assessing whether race was the predominant factor in drawing the lines of the other 11 districts, and remanded the case to the district court to evaluate those 11 districts under the proper standard. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 6:36 am
Furthermore, while the trial court clearly erred in instructing the jury on state of mind, the error did not “seriously impair” the integrity of the proceedings (U.S. v. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 5:00 am
Accordingly, the court affirmed the district court’s ruling and dismissed the complaint for failure to state a claim. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 3:35 am
” But Justice Samuel Alito returned the discussion to reality by highlighting that the challenging statutory issue in this case stemmed from the court’s own decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
This is particularly so given the Supreme Court’s holding in 1989 in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:29 pm
” Mason v. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm
First, United States ex rel. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 12:04 pm
Yet neither the district court, nor the court of appeals that affirmed the ruling, ordered the PTO to cancel the registration, despite that registration’s invalidity. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:51 am
A federal district court and the 9th Circuit held otherwise. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 11:18 am
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Mathews v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:27 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:27 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 9:27 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:00 am
In determining whether Congress implicitly precluded federal district court jurisdiction, the court must first determine if preclusion is discernable from the text, structure, and purpose of the statute. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
In an elegant act of “judicial jujitsu,” the Supreme Court issued its decision in Marbury v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 9:06 am
One relevant difference between Missouri and many other states, and all the federal courts, is that some courts in Missouri engage in a particularly edentulous form of judicial gatekeeping of expert witness opinion testimony. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 8:29 am
It has now been more than 12 years since the Supreme Court’s landmark opinion in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Not without the Fourth Amendment coming into play, a federal court ruled last week in United States v. [read post]
