Search for: "State v. May"
Results 4181 - 4200
of 120,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2010, 2:43 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 3:04 am
R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State (No.2) [2011] EWCA Civ 639 is one that we may have missed when it first came out (or we decided not to do it – we can’t quite remember now), but, given that I have some free time this morning, I thought I’d do a short note on it. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 6:22 am
In Baanyan Software Services Inc. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
No private right of action against "state actors" pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 2:39 am
No private right of action against “state actors” pursuant to 42 USC 1981, the Civil Rights LawMcGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632, Decided January 28, 2009The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination.Paul McGovern, a Caucasian male, was employed by the City of Philadelphia.On September 25, 2003, McGovern filed a complaint of race… [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 10:46 am
and mens rea (did Twitter have a culpable mental state?) [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Miranda v. [read post]
14 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
The case captioned Purdue University v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 5:18 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
(3) Score one for consistency: Justice Alito’s test for when officers can remove a objector to trigger the usual common authority test of United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 1:27 pm
Earlier this year there was hope in the food and drug industries that the Supreme Court would revisit and possibly revise the Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine, also known as the Park Doctrine, by granting certiorari to the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:13 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 9:03 pm
Tierney v Patchogue Fire Dept. [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 9:00 pm
McGovern v Philadelphia, USCA Third Circuit, No. 08-1632 The McGovern decision holds that employees of a municipality may not sue the City of Philadelphia pursuant to 42 USC 1981 for alleged race discrimination. [read post]
4 Oct 2012, 10:40 am
The United States Supreme Court recently announced that it will hear oral arguments on Missouri v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 1:07 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 8:59 am
[Cite to Ohio State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2017, 4:00 am
" However, the Circuit Court dismissed this contention, explaining that such a claim "is not cognizable in a civil case," citing United States v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 5:46 pm
I am a long-term member of the Jury Charge committee of my state bar in the United States, a committee that writes the legal instructions to the jury in civil cases, and was thus very pleased to observe the closing arguments and the Judge’s summing up to the jury in the recent trial of Cooper v Evening Standard and Associated Newspapers, a civil jury trial that arose from a newspaper article that incorrectly reported that Mr. [read post]
