Search for: "State v. Stephens." Results 4181 - 4200 of 7,110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2014, 9:20 am by Paul Smith
As Justice Stephen Breyer pointed out in dissent, there is no way to square the Court’s blessing of multi-million-dollar checks being passed to a senior leader of Congress for later disbursal with the Court’s holding in McConnell v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 5:49 am
Stephen Melvin Regarding Statistical Confidence Levels" [#254 filed February 3, 2014]; "Defendant Dell Inc.' s Sealed Motion to Exclude the Proposed Expert Testimony of Robert Mills" [#258 filed February 5, 2014]; and plaintiffs "Sealed Motion to Exclude the Proposed Expert Testimony of Stephen Magee" [#266 filed February 13, 2014]. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 5:19 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The petitioner, A, filed for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court requesting the reversal of the decision of the New York State Court of Appeals. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
The Press explains:On March 8, 1971, the Supreme Court of the United States decided a case, Griggs v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:47 am by Benjamin Minegar
Stephens [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] was sentenced to death in state court in the late 1980s. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 8:44 am by Lyle Denniston
Stephens, grew out of the killing of a police officer during the robbery of an adult bookstore in Houston in July 1988. [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
United States (1926), but they never acknowledge that the Brandeis dissent was rooted in a commitment to participatory democracy that Reynolds did not share. [read post]
19 Mar 2014, 7:21 pm by Kelly Phillips Erb
Yes, Nate Silver or Stephen Smith could be your office mates but chances are they’re not. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 5:27 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant contends that the plaintiff's complaint does not state a cause of action and merits sanctions as frivolous. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 10:40 am
On March 4, 2014, Justice Antonin Scalia delivered the Supreme Court's opinion in Law v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 8:00 am by John Elwood
Stephens, 13-6646, a one-time relist in which a pro se petitioner (in gaol for having a bit too much o’ the green) argued that he was denied counsel at a “critical stage” of his criminal proceedings in violation of United States v. [read post]