Search for: "United States v. May" Results 4181 - 4200 of 47,649
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The boys were subsequently sentenced to life in prison and their cases are now before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:24 pm by Andrew W. Torrance
On its second opportunity, the United States Supreme Court has granted a writ of certiorari to hear an appeal of Prometheus Laboratories, Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2010, 12:34 pm by jmehalik
The American Constitution Society’s Indianapolis Chapter hosted a discussion of the Supreme Court of the United State’s decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 8:30 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
A private experiment is not prior art, when it is not published, nor used, sold or otherwise made known, nor included in a United States patent application.Kimberly–Clark Corp. v. [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
United States The Verge had a piece on a group of Senate Republicans planning to introduce a privacy bill that would regulate the data collected by coronavirus contact tracing apps. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:43 am by Thomas P. Gulick
The Supreme Court of the United States has taken on two high-profile intellectual property cases, American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 5:28 am
" United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am by Anna Christensen
§ 3582(c)(2) as “sentencings at which [United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
This defense comes from a United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit case (also, confusingly enough, named City of New York v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 4:23 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The United States Supreme Court will hear Chiafalo v. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by SHG
  This was the rule since Marbury v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 11:12 am
  Maybe not a massive amount, since Mexican troops have never really invaded the United States. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 6:41 am by David Canton
One of the issues was whether the appearance of the trade-mark on a website viewable in Canada that originated from the United States was "use" of that trade-mark in Canada. [read post]