Search for: "Does 1 - 29" Results 4201 - 4220 of 13,847
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2010, 12:30 am by Giorgio Buono
C-133/08), was lodged on 29 July 2010 under C-384/10, Jan Voogsgeerd v Navimer SA. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 11:41 am by Filip Radzikowski
However, only recently has it experienced an exceptional surge in popularity in Asia and the Middle East[1] and recently it is getting footing in European and US markets. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:23 am
The 1975 Consumer Goods Pricing Act, which repealed a 1937 statute permitting states to authorize VRPM, does not indicate a congressional intent to retain the per se rule. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  Relying on Salzberg, the court reasoned that (1) federal securities claims are not “internal corporate claims” that Section 115 addresses, and (2) Section 115 is a permissive, rather than restrictive, statute—meaning that its silence on federal claims does not indicate a prohibition on applying an otherwise valid forum selection clause to such claims. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:17 pm by Bryn Miller
Scenario 1: An employee views an on-demand webinar directly related to her job, which provides CEU credit toward her professional licensing requirement. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 11:02 am by chucknewton
"  (Emphasis added).The Court had to decide two questions -- when does the clock begin to running in this regard, and when does it stop? [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 11:47 pm
Russian Corporate Law created after the collapse of the Soviet Union was specifically fit to satisfy the needs of a country with a developing newly privatized economy and aimed at raising confidence in the capitalist model of society. [1] Professor Bernard Black, who devoted his scholarship inter alia to corporate law governance in emerging markets and participated in the creation of what is the basis of the current Russian corporate legislation, proposed a “self-enforcing”… [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:30 am by DONALD SCARINCI
In concluding that FISA does not trump the state secrets privilege, the Court cited the text of FISA. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:58 pm by Nico Cordes
Entgegen der Ansicht der Einsprechenden habe das EPA auch weder mit der Empfangsbescheinigung vom 29. [read post]