Search for: "Florida v. Wells" Results 4201 - 4220 of 6,313
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Notably, there was no suggestion that any unequal treatment of votes under Florida’s process was invidious.I am far from convinced that Bush v. [read post]
28 Apr 2013, 10:39 pm by Shouvik Kumar Guha
Image from hereThe weekly review starts with a post by Gopika on the UK Supreme Court decision in Public Relations Consultants Association Limited v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 9:43 am
The court undertook a state-by-state analysis of all 22 states – Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida (citing a case we sent to Westlaw), Georgia, Illinois (rejecting Dolin v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 9:36 am by David Cosgrove
Scott Campbell was sentenced to 20 years in prison for conducting a Ponzi scheme over the internet from Florida. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 9:02 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The lawyers comment that "[t]here is ... nothing 'purported' about Professor Damian, whose opinion is well-substantiated by her scholarly writings as well as by the opinion of Luis Chang, Minister Counselor of Peru, who has examined the artifacts and advised that the artifacts constitute part of the Peruvian cultural heritage." [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
Trayvon Martin’s Prior Bad Acts Marijuana Use Evidence of drug use is controlled by the Florida Supreme Court decision of Edwards v. [read post]
25 May 2013, 2:14 am
Trayvon Martin’s Prior Bad Acts Marijuana Use Evidence of drug use is controlled by the Florida Supreme Court decision of Edwards v. [read post]
10 Dec 2019, 11:31 am by The Law Office of John Guidry II
  Long before Turner, the law in Florida was well settled on the validity of fingerprint arguments (and similar doubts arising from the lack of evidence). [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 2:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
He can say, “I heard V threaten to kill me, saw him reaching for his waistband, and was sure that he was going to shoot me”; and unless the jury concludes beyond a reasonable doubt that D — again, the only witness — is lying, D will be off the hook, even if D was well aware that V was no threat at all and just wanted to kill him. [read post]