Search for: "Gooding v. United States" Results 4201 - 4220 of 21,099
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2020, 9:09 pm by Corynne McSherry
And for good reason: treating social media companies like “public forums” gives users less ability to respond to misuse, not more.Instead, those courts have correctly adopted the rule on editorial freedom from the Supreme Court’s 1974 decision in Miami Herald Co. v Tornillo. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 2:19 pm by Corynne McSherry
Outside of the beltway, people all over the United States are taking to the streets to demand fundamental change. [read post]
1 Jun 2020, 5:42 am by Richard Hunt
A new decision from the United States District Court in Illinois, Miracle-Pond, et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2020, 3:28 pm
Contents include: Edward Chukwuemeke Okeke, Jurisdictional Immunity of International Organizations in the United States in the Wake of the Supreme Court Decision in Jam v. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
(a) It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet. [read post]
29 May 2020, 7:52 am by Elliot Setzer
(a) It is the policy of the United States to foster clear ground rules promoting free and open debate on the internet. [read post]
28 May 2020, 3:07 pm by Townsend Bourne and Nikole Snyder
Cyberspace Solarium Commission, which was established to “develop a consensus on a strategic approach to defending the United States in cyberspace against cyber attacks of significant consequences,” released a Report in March 2020 recommending the Sarbanes-Oxley Act be amended to include new Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) cybersecurity reporting requirements. [read post]
28 May 2020, 11:18 am by Eugene Volokh
Likewise, sec. 4 of the draft Order says that "It is the policy of the United States that large social media platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the functional equivalent of a traditional public forum, should not infringe on protected speech. [read post]
28 May 2020, 5:29 am by Schachtman
”[5] This rejection of the clear demands of a statute has infected even the intermediate appellate United States Court of Appeals. [read post]
26 May 2020, 12:00 pm by Public Employment Law Press
[PBA], as the exclusive bargaining representative for certain employees in a negotiating unit, and the State of New York [Petitioner] had entered into a collective bargaining agreement [CBA] covering unit personnel that included contract articles addressing winter work schedules, summer work schedules and, as pertinent here, provisions concerning seniority and vacancies, modifying unit members' shifts, and contract grievance procedures. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:06 am by Larry
 That brings us to the first of a pair of decisions: United States v. [read post]