Search for: "In re F. E." Results 4201 - 4220 of 7,240
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2013, 9:02 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Antor Media Corp., 689 F.3d 1282, 1289 (Fed. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:49 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Zletz, 893 F.2d 319, 321 (Fed. [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 8:03 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
See In re Fulton,391 F.3d 1195, 1201 (Fed. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 9:00 pm by Laurent Teyssèdre
Dans une première décision prise en 2003, la division d'opposition avait refusé d'admettre le document D19 fourni tardivement et maintenu le brevet sous une forme modifiée, avec ajout dans la revendication d'une caractéristique f. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 7:05 pm by Douglas
Cuidar do lixo não é uma tarefa fácil. [read post]
3 Feb 2013, 7:05 pm by Douglas
Cuidar do lixo não é uma tarefa fácil. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 2:19 pm by Jack Pringle
Section 2000(e)), the Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment prevents unreasonable discrimination by governmental bodies (federal, state and local). [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am by Bexis
  If so, you’re already one up on Arters. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:18 pm by mike
Cir. 1998) (“Nor does the patent statute require that an invention be complex in order to be nonobvious”); In re Oetiker, 977 F.2d 1443, 1446 (Fed. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 3:19 am by John L. Welch
In re Vertex Group LLC, 89 USPQ2d 1694 (TTAB 2009) [TTABlogged here]; Nextel Communications v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:59 pm by VALL Blog Master
The art of modern China, by Julia F. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
As the Court points out: “En l’espèce, les photographies litigieuses ont été publiées sur un site Internet appartenant à une société gérée par les deux premiers requérants, dans le but notamment de les vendre ou d’y donner accès contre rémunération. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 2:56 am by John L. Welch
She also pointed to third-party registrations showing that similar designs are registered on the Supplemental Register or under Section 2(f) [i.e., they were deemed not to be inherently distinctive]. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 7:49 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Welsh, 956 F.2d 30 (2d Cir. 1992); In Re Jet Florida Systems, Inc., 883 F.2d 970, 976 (11th Cir. 1989); In Re Gutches, 430 B.R. 342, 345-47 (E.D. [read post]