Search for: "Lay v. Lay" Results 4201 - 4220 of 8,598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
DOS, on the other hand, asserted as an affirmative defense that, for economic reasons, they exercised management rights reserved under the CBA by laying off 200 out of 330 supervisors, and reassigning the remaining supervisors to additional district sections. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 5:19 am by Joy Waltemath
However, she failed to raise a triable issue on whether her subsequent termination for confronting her harasser and physically laying her hands on him during that altercation (while her boyfriend stood behind her holding a hammer) was retaliation for her prior complaints of harassment, and summary judgment was affirmed on that claim (Walker v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:48 am by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
23 Dec 2014, 6:41 am by Joy Waltemath
“Such lay evidence, however, is inadmissible in court,” the appeals court explained, “and thus cannot be used to oppose summary judgment. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 10:00 am by Dan Ernst
We live today in a global community¡V in particular, a global legal community¡V and we would like to foster legal scholarship on a transnational basis. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 8:34 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
This case summarizes the lay of the land.The case is Stropkay v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 7:21 pm
Lai, The Exhaustion Doctrine and Genetic Use Restriction Technologies: A Look at Bowman v Monsanto Pawarit Lertdhamtewe, Protection of Plant Varieties in Thailand Cees Mulder, Patent Law Treaty: Promises Not Delivered-How the Negotiations Resulted in Ambiguities in the Treaty [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:25 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
Even if the police could have handled things better, they are entitled to qualified immunity because they did not violate clearly established law.The case is Veeder v Nutting, a summary order decided on December 15. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 2:43 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 3:18 am by Samuel Sherwood, Olswang LLP
The responsibility to disclose the commission payments lay with Paragon, as they were the only party that could have known the full extent of them. [read post]