Search for: "Matter of Thomas" Results 4201 - 4220 of 11,347
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2007, 4:01 pm
One of the most troubling aspects of the lacrosse case has been the decision of the state NAACP to adopt positions at odds with a 70 years' legacy on criminal justice matters, on issues ranging from changes of venue in racially charged cases, to skepticism about suggestive witness lineups, to opposing victims' rights efforts. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 7:43 pm by Schachtman
Yeah1 Mark Lanier’s Deceptive Cartoon Advocacy A recent book by Kurt Andersen details the extent of American fantasy, in matters religious, political, and scientific.2 Andersen’s book is a good read and a broad-ranging dissection of the American psyche for cadswallop. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 8:33 am by Green, Schafle & Gibbs
This list of alleged wrongdoing and misconduct reads a lot like a police blotter on money matters. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 1:27 am
First addressing the question whether this was a substantial enough change of circumstances to make it appropriate to reconsider the earlier custody order, Judge Thomas J. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 8:47 am by Marty Lederman
First, the government confirms in detail, at pages 3-6 of its reply brief, what I surmised last week:  Both of the conditions would undermine the government's furtherance of its compelling interests, principally because there would be state-law obstacles to the creation of contraception-only insurance policies, and because the "opt in" requirement would impose burdens on women that their male counterparts do not share and that would, as a practical matter, decrease the… [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:24 am
This is so, according to the Court, no matter how young the child, no matter how many times the child is raped, no matter how many children the perpetrator rapes, no matter how sadistic the crime, no matter how much physical or psychological trauma is inflicted, and no matter how heinous the perpetrator's prior criminal record may be. [read post]
27 Oct 2018, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  Matters would be different if the decision in ABC v Telegraph Group concerned a permanent injunction or if the resolution of the full trial had raised serious matters of legal principle. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by John Dean
As just noted Justices Thomas and Alito frequently disagreed with Scalia. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:31 am by Richard A. Epstein
  Every serious tort case has this side to it, no matter how complicated the issue. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:09 am by Jeralyn
Thomas could not offer the United States District Court jury his opinion on the legality of the contributions. [read post]
21 Dec 2018, 12:56 pm by Amy Howe
Chief Justice John Roberts provided the deciding vote, as four justices – Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh – indicated that they would have granted the government’s application. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:36 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Both Thomas and Deidre received grants and/or scholarships, which must be subtracted from tuition to determine the parents' respective obligations. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 7:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
"I would like to thank the current Rome City School District Administration for their cooperation in this matter. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 3:32 am by NCC Staff
Clarence Thomas was 43 years old when he was confirmed for the Supreme Court in 1991. [read post]
11 May 2023, 8:43 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
So maybe arguments don’t matter; it’s all power and ideology now. [read post]