Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 4,555
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 May 2009, 2:02 pm
That Holmes chestnut from Schenck v. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Consumer protection/fraud class actions have increased a staggering 156% over the same period and now account for approximately 20.8% of all federal class actions–up from 13.9% in 2001.[4] Recent years have seen a boom in the use of federal labor statutes, such as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, ERISA, and the Fair Labor Standards Act, and in suits brought under federal fraud statutes, particularly the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act… [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 11:55 am
Commissioner Rosch v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 1:00 pm
TPMs are precisely the kind of use-facilitating TPMs Congress sought to promote. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm
The taxpayer there had held shares of Standard Oil of California stock, and when the company declared a “stock dividend” (essentially, but not precisely, a stock split), the tax code required that she be taxed.In one sense, the majority’s decision in favor of Ms Macomber seems intuitively correct. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:40 pm
To aid in thinking about this question, consider Grutter v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Public Health Laurie Beyranevand, Vermont Law School, Can Revised Standards of Identify Achieve Greater Public Health Outcomes? [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 7:37 am
The online regulator could adopt the standard of the most easily offended reader. [read post]
5 Jan 2019, 3:06 pm
In the course of exchanges with a number of us who raised an eyebrow at this, she went on : https://twitter.com/louisetickle/status/1060817556217516032 I’m in no doubt that the family justice system means well, but that is utterly inadequate as a standard. [read post]
23 May 2022, 6:11 am
” The consequence: There are “increasingly insistent demands for conformity to a single universal standard in speech and religion. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 8:55 am
Yet the memos in question would shield him from being held accountable precisely because he won that office. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 3:32 pm
In this case, the trial court did precisely what we have long said it could. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:41 pm
In Brehm v. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
” The challengers filed their lawsuit in Amarillo, Tex., where it was all but certain to be heard by Matthew Kacsmaryk, a conservative federal jurist there who, before becoming a judge, had written articles criticizing the court’s landmark decision in Roe v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:34 am
This brings us to Zaidan and Kareem. [read post]
17 Sep 2024, 10:59 am
Susan V. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 12:29 am
It is also uncontested that general guidance for producing the claimed ethylene olefin copolymer is provided in paragraphs 81 to 93 of the patent in suit, including a description of the amount of catalyst and co-catalyst to be used (see paragraphs 86 and 87 of the patent in suit).2.2 The respondent pointed out in section 51 of their rejoinder that the disputed patent describes several synthesis examples providing a detailed description of catalysts and reaction conditions used for… [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 3:48 pm
But it still provides useful instruction, and I therefore commend it to your reading list: 130 S.Ct. 1367 (2010) UNITED STUDENT AID FUNDS, INC., Petitioner, v. [read post]
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm
She then refused to stand precisely where she was instructed to stand, telling officers, “you can keep an eye on me from right here. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 2:31 am
Reliance on force majeure When considering the impact of a particular event on the ability of a party to perform its obligations, there are a number of matters which the parties will need to consider (noting that the precise application will always turn on the drafting of the provision): Was the party prevented, hindered or delayed (depending on the construction of the clause) from performing the contract because of the relevant event? [read post]
