Search for: "State v. Congress"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 29,283
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2017, 3:37 pm
On July 7, 2017, the California Supreme Court filed its 69-page opinion, written by Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye and joined by five other justices, in Friends of the Eel River v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 6:22 pm
" Everything was going along fine until Marvel stumbled across Brulotte v Thys (1964). [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:46 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 12:07 pm
The two leading cases specifying the “compelling state interest” test – Holt v. [read post]
5 Nov 2016, 1:14 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:46 am
Second, both the Supreme Court and Congress have repeatedly stated that patents are property, and have appeared to treat them as such. [2] In James v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:03 am
Quill Corporation v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 12:00 pm
In Nelson v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:08 pm
It's not quite apple pie, baseball, or a V-8 engine, but it's been with us longer than each of those, albeit in varying forms. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 8:07 am
United States v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:00 am
United States: “We hold that Miranda, being a constitutional decision of this Court, may not be in effect overruled by an Act of Congress, and we decline to overrule Miranda ourselves. [read post]
26 Jan 2008, 10:22 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 12:32 pm
Geren and Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:04 am
Luxshare, Ltd. and Alixpartners, LLP, et al., v. the Fund for Protection of Investor’s Rights in Foreign States. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 10:32 pm
For the reasons stated, we are satisfied it does not. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:52 am
Amazon, Joseph v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 9:27 pm
On June 28, 2012, the United States Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in NFIB v. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:07 am
The United States Congress has declared that the purpose of the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), located in Chapter 28 of Title 29 of the U.S. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 7:47 am
Its main argument is that Congress went beyond its powers by specifically directing the outcome of a pending federal court case, in violation of an 1872 decision by the Supreme Court (United States v. [read post]
