Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 9,084
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2017, 1:00 am
On Wednesday 22 to Thursday 23 February, the Supreme Court will hear the appeals of Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Homes Ltd & Anor and Richborough Estates Partnership LLP & Anor v Cheshire East Borough Council. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm
Meanwhile, in a parallel action brought by the State of Virginia, Federal District Judge Leonie Brinkema found that one of the claims of anti-Muslim discrimination against EO 13769—under the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause—was likely to succeed on the merits. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 8:50 am
Third, the Supreme Court recently upended (or clarified, if you prefer) some First Amendment precedent in a case called Reed v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:58 am
In the Twenty-First Century, it is just unreasonable to expect judicial spouses to keep their opinions to themselves or to refrain from working for causes in which they believe. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
The same problems exist but have not been acknowledged in state court under article 15 of the Massachusetts Constitution. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
The same problems exist but have not been acknowledged in state court under article 15 of the Massachusetts Constitution. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 9:22 am
The same problems exist but have not been acknowledged in state court under article 15 of the Massachusetts Constitution. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
First, the panel distinguished away with gossamer threads Kleindienst v. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 7:12 am
“Despite the district court’s and our own repeated invitations to explain the urgent need for the Executive Order to be placed immediately into effect, the Government submitted no evidence to rebut the States’ argument that the district court’s order merely returned the nation temporarily to the position it has occupied for many previous years. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:09 pm
” Zadvidas v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
Later that evening, Washington submitted a letter to the district court to that effect, stating that the Attorney General “assume[s] the district court briefing schedule is no longer applicable. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 2:30 am
Madison, the Supreme Court established its power of judicial review. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 4:28 pm
In Kleindienst v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:08 am
In Washington v Trump, the 9th circuit court of appeals declined to grant a stay of the federal district court’s order. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:00 am
As the Supreme Court has stated in Larson v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 9:21 am
See Nken v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:32 am
The agency again asserted the state secrets privilege, and the district court granted summary judgment. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:20 am
First, the rule fosters judicial restraint: courts faced with unsettled questions avoid pronouncements that are perhaps unnecessary and undesirable because the rightholders do not wish to assert their rights. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:41 pm
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its per curiam ruling in Washington v. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 7:16 pm
Fox v. [read post]
