Search for: "U.S. v. STATE OF TEXAS"
Results 4201 - 4220
of 8,655
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Feb 2012, 4:59 am
” On January 25, 2012, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals issued its opinion in the case of Johnson v. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am
Texas, 141 S. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 11:38 am
Gun advocates, it would seem, are emboldened in the wake of D.C. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 4:55 pm
United States, 571 U.S. 204, 134 S. [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
Consideration of Hamdi v. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 3:10 am
See Springs Window Fashions LP v. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 12:24 pm
The U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 11:57 am
Courts Tell Police to Keep their Dogs’ Noses out of Curtilage The one thing made abundantly clear by the Texas Court of Appeals’ December 16, 2015 decision in State v. [read post]
23 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 2:47 am
Mesa, the Supreme Court considered a case from the Fifth Circuit where a Mexican teen was shot and killed while standing on Mexico's territory by a U.S. border patrol agent on the United States side of the border in El Paso, Texas. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
Ranch of Texas, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2006, 3:30 pm
Miles was decided, the Court held in United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 5:44 am
App. 1993) citing Texas v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 10:47 am
The Supreme Court in the 1995 case of Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am
Substantial State Interest As usual, the court credits the state’s interest in protecting children’s privacy and physical/psychological well-being. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:12 am
” Yesterday was the 43rd anniversary of Roe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
Abbott, the “one person, one vote” challenge to the state legislative maps in Texas. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:32 am
After a hearing on the evidence, U.S. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:58 am
Virginia, 388 U.S. 1, 12 (1967), has no textual or historical pedigree, much like the right to abortion that this Court invented in Roe v. [read post]
