Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 4221 - 4240 of 10,148
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2022, 6:01 am by Shayan Karbassi
The talks first began in early 2021 between the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Russia, China and Iran. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:00 pm
Applying the federal Bill of Rights against the states had not yet begun, a process law students learn to call “incorporation” of the Bill of Rights against the states. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 1:55 pm by Aaron Pelley
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/288773.opn.doc.pdf Federal Law Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals: United States v. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:32 am by Ryan McKeen
Every day, 1000 people in the United States require emergency room care for dog bites. [read post]
24 Sep 2017, 7:32 am by Ryan McKeen
Every day, 1000 people in the United States require emergency room care for dog bites. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Eric Segall
Section 3 says the following:No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:59 am by Elizabeth Slattery
The Biden administration says this applies to every person in the United States with an eligible student loan and relies on the COVID-19 pandemic as the national emergency to justify its action. [read post]
29 May 2008, 7:14 pm
Crime and Consequences reports that the Federalist Society has a new podcast available discussing the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 7:30 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
Rickie Solinger is a historian, and the author of Pregnancy and Power: A History of Reproductive Politics in the United States (2007), Beggars and Choosers: How the Politics of Choice Shapes Adoption, Abortion and Welfare in the United States (2002), and Wake Up, Little Susie: Single Pregnancy and Race Before Roe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:03 pm by Alex Moss
And virtually none of the applications originating in China are “triadic patents” (patents filed jointly in the patent offices of Japan, the United States, and European Union), which are widely considered “the gold standard” for patent protection. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 8:56 pm by Orin Kerr
Nourse, 31 U.S. 470, 480 (1832) (referring to “[t]he answer of the United States of America, to a bill of injunction filed against them in the district court of the United States for the district of Potomac, by Joseph Nourse, late register of the treasury of the United States. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 4:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
It may have a bearing on what is shaping up as the first attempt in Congress to write a new law reacting to the Supreme Court's decision last week in Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 6:22 am by Adam Chandler
” Also, at PrawfsBlawg, Bill Araiza compares three recent Supreme Court cases—Citizens United, United States v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 4:46 am by Amy Howe
United States, in which the Court will consider whether criminal defendants whose assets have been frozen have a right to a pretrial hearing to challenge the basis for the charges against them so that they can use the assets to hire their counsel of choice. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 8:03 am
Solicitor General to provide the government's views on whether states have any authority to bar cell phone companies from listing taxes and fees as separate items on customers' monthly bills (Sprint Nextel v. [read post]