Search for: "In Re Steven" Results 4221 - 4240 of 6,044
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2010, 12:30 pm by Lisa McElroy
Just as the clerks for Justice Stevens did, Justice Alito’s clerks do their own first pass through all of the cert. petitions, making a post in Alito’s chambers especially rigorous. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am by Steve Sady
The Supreme Court’s opinion in McDonald, which extended the federal Second Amendment protections in identical form to the States, should finally bring an end to Oregon’s deviant non-unanimous jury rule. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:04 am by Jay Rivera
Get Steven Spielberg on the Phone – I Need to Sentence Someone to Death [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm by Steven M. Taber
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:57 am by StephanieWestAllen
Some group systems theories posit that a scary giant turned gentle will require much energy of a group to adjust, adapt, and re-form. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 9:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Stevens, the majority opinion said: The demand for hunting depictions exceeds the estimated demand for crush videos or animal fighting depictions by several orders of magnitude. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 11:08 pm by Matt Rita
Now that we’re into the summer season of recycled shows, we’ll assume that all stale claims are time-barred. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 1:39 pm by Visae Patentes
In fact, the IP blogosphere vibrates:Leagal Analysis:IPJur: "SCOTUS Opinion in re Bilsiki is out! [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 8:33 pm by Lisa McElroy
I’ve got lots of questions in my Plain English inbox, including queries about what Justice Stevens will do now and why we have confirmation hearings if they’re just the “charade” many think them to be. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 3:56 pm by David Kravets
“The government will not confirm you’re on this, explain the basis of being on the list, or give an opportunity to rebut why you’re on the list. [read post]