Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 6,274
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2011, 1:35 pm
” Davis, a professor at American University’s Washington College of Law, explains: “They decide whether a person’s going to be charged, what to charge them with, whether there’s going to be a plea bargain and what the plea bargain will be. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 12:19 pm
Why You Should Fight Lawsuits by Debt Buying Companies - by John Skiba15 Symptoms that a Plan Sponsor's Retirement Plan might be "Ill" - by The Rosenbaum Law Firm P.C.US v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 11:33 am
Feldman Law Group, P.C. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 5:55 pm
Siegel v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 2:12 pm
Retractable Technologies et al. v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 6:59 am
(Willard v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 4:14 am
Davis, 2011 NMCA 102, 2011 N.M. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:21 am
United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
30 Oct 2011, 5:04 am
On 19 October 2011, the Supreme Court (Lord Hope, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson) released its decision in the joined cases of R (Davies & Anor) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs and R (Gaines-Cooper) v The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs [2011] UKSC 47. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
. would have changed the prescribers' decisions to continue prescribing [the drug] to [plaintiff]”) (applying Minnesota law); Johnson v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 6:44 am
Davis, 531 U.S. 230, 241 (2001); see also Lexecon Inc. v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 6:51 am
Davis, 905 F.2d 245, 24849 (9th Cir.1990)). [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
In fact, there are only three: the Fourth Amendment violation at issue in Bivens itself, a sexual harassment claim against a member of Congress by one of his secretaries (Davis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:18 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 1:14 pm
The case is U.S. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
BCTV 1998 CanLII 6527 (BC CA), (1998), 59 B.C.L.R. (3d) 121 (C.A.), at para. 29 [7] Hollinsworth, supra., at para. 13, see also Davis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 10:35 am
BCTV 1998 CanLII 6527 (BC CA), (1998), 59 B.C.L.R. (3d) 121 (C.A.), at para. 29 [7] Hollinsworth, supra., at para. 13, see also Davis v. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Davis, Jonathan R. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 4:30 am
Davis, Jonathan R. [read post]
