Search for: "Mark May" Results 4221 - 4240 of 64,950
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2019, 3:54 am by Louise Thorning Ahle
Generally, evidence showing use of the mark in neighbouring countries or registration of the mark internationally will not assist in the registration of the mark. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 3:40 am by John L. Welch
Da Bears contend that this mark will likely cause confusion, dilution, and false association vis-a-vis various BEARS-formative marks. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:53 am by Josh H. Escovedo
” “Consumers, like competitors, may have a real interest in keeping merely descriptive or generic words in the public domain, (1) to prevent the owner of a mark from inhibiting competition in the sale of particular goods; and (2) to maintain freedom of the public to use the language involved, thus avoiding the possibility of harassing infringement suits by the registrant against others who use the mark when advertising or describing their own products. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 8:01 pm
This basic similarity between the services outweighs any dissimilarity that might be presumed from the fact that the public may be able to distinguish between the two pageants themselves due to their different contestant pools. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 8:59 am by Dennis Crouch
  When the company finally got around to registering the mark in 2011, some of his relatives opposed the registration. [read post]
6 May 2017, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
The spectacular film footage destroyed public and industry faith in airships and marked the end of the giant passenger-carrying airships. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:43 am by Arfaa Law Group
If you fail to file the claim within this time frame, you may lose your right to compensation altogether. [read post]
29 May 2013, 8:00 am by EEM
Innovative ICT Helps Aid Workers in Afghanistan (IRIN, May 2013) [text] Media Outlets Multiply, but Aid Communication still Missing Mark (IRIN, May 2013) [text] Moving Forward with Technology: Another Tool in the Toolbox? [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 7:15 am by Maike Lorenz (Hoffmann Eitle)
In particular, is should be known that the Plaintiff’s e-versions of their cars are to date usually marked as “e-tron”. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
The trade mark was accepted and published on 10 May 2004. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
 James may own a sound recording copyright (for the master recording) but that doesn't give him any dibs over the song copyright. [read post]
13 Dec 2019, 4:15 am by Erika Murray
Torontonians may have accepted the loss of Kawhi Leonard, but another Raptors asset is still at risk: their newest logo. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
” Regardless of their reasons for wearing houndstooth apparel however, there is no evidence the houndstooth of the fans’ apparel functions as a source or sponsorship indicator for the University’s goods and services, or that it was authorized by the University....While applicants selected their mark because Alabama fans associate the Houndstooth Pattern with Coach Bryant’s patterned fedora, there is no evidence that applicants sought to confuse consumers as to… [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 6:00 am by The Dear Rich Staff
So, if someone invented a sport, or recreational activity, for example, Knockerball, and exclusively exploited the mark in commerce, a trademark registration may be awarded. [read post]
27 May 2013, 3:04 am by Jeremy
Good news for anyone who is filing trade marks into Rwanda -- and also for any enterprising Rwandans who are planning to spread the influence and the protection of their brands. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:28 am
The plaintiff began this action contending that the defendant had abandoned the foreign marks under the Lanham Act by failing to exercise any control, including quality control, over the marks. [read post]
15 May 2013, 4:16 am by John L. Welch
Lee refused registration on the ground that the mark is not a substantially exact representation of the mark as used on the goods, as required by Rule 2.51(b). [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 2:30 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
§ 1052(d) (providing a mark may not be placed on theprincipal register if it so resembles a mark already registered“as to be likely . . . to cause confusion”). [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 6:15 am by Jennifer Ko Craft
This leapfrogging of rights may be the saving grace to Smashburger’s rights in its Triple Double mark. [read post]