Search for: "Marks v. State " Results 4221 - 4240 of 21,684
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2020, 6:10 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
As employees reached the 10 percent mark, the employer issued a warning so that they had the opportunity to attempt to bring their rate down in the latter portion of the year. [read post]
If the latter, then this may be contrasted with the approach taken by Pumfrey J in Abbott v Ranbaxy [2004] where he stated that had he not granted summary judgment on validity grounds, he would have granted a preliminary injunction. [read post]
While the plaintiff’s filing of an application to register the SULKA mark in the United States was “certainly relevant” to intent to market products in the United States, it had little bearing on his ability to expand his business to the United States (Selah v. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the court released a unanimous opinion in Lomax v. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 12:20 am
11Cir Affirms Convictions Of Army Veteran and Texas Lawyer For International Money Laundering, Mail, and Wire Fraud Conspiracies.United States of America, Plaintiff/Appellee, v. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
Hunton Andrews Kurt Privacy & Information Security Law Blog had a post “EDPB Releases Statement on Restrictions on Data Subject Rights in Connection with the State of Emergency in Member States”. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am by Riana Harvey
The logo’s protection as a US and an EU trade mark also doesn’t hurt. [read post]