Search for: "May v. Summers" Results 4221 - 4240 of 4,735
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2009, 2:42 pm
District Court for the Central District of California, urging dismissal of Smelt v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
  The lead case is Utility Air Regulatory Group v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As I explain, the style of Cheeseburger may strike people who knew Sherry well as at least somewhat insincere. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
On July 6, 2018, the Second Circuit ruled in favor of the policyholder in Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Alice Woolley
Consider the Supreme Court’s recent judgment in Groia v Law Society of Upper Canada 2018 SCC 27. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 5:37 am by Chris Castle
These Phonorecords IV rates are in effect for five years, but the next negotiation for new rates is coming soon (called Phonorecords V or PR V for short). [read post]
30 Aug 2018, 4:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
On July 6, 2018, the Second Circuit ruled in favor of the policyholder in Medidata Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 am by Josh Sturtevant
After some initial success, the club has fallen on hard times, sold most of its players, and may need to go into receivership. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
 This alleged scheme came in a case called Jones v. [read post]
30 May 2014, 9:20 am by Amy Howe
 There is no deadline for such briefs, but the Offfice of the Solicitor General frequently files several briefs in May so that the Court can consider the petitions at issue before its summer recess, which normally begins in late June. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by ngodridge
”[15]  To align the Regulation with the text of the CEA, the CFTC also proposed removing the terms “relate to” and “reference” wherever they appear and referring to event contracts that “involve” an Enumerated Activity or prescribed similar activity.[16]  Two Republican commissioners dissented from the proposed amendment, citing its breadth.[17]  A substantial part of Commissioner Summer K. [read post]