Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 8,629
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Sep 2015, 5:34 pm
Henning has a post that begins, "The appeals court decision in United States v. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 10:00 am
This case is being prosecuted by Assistant Attorney General Philip V. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
Aletheia Research and Management, Inc. and Peter J. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 9:10 pm
II) Transparency v. [read post]
12 Sep 2015, 6:43 am
Milo Brown, No. 111,345 (Sedgwick)Direct appeal; felony murderLydia Krebs (brief); Peter Maharry (argue)Insufficient evidence of aggravated robberyInsufficient evidence of underlying offense for felony murderLife sentence violates "double rule"State v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm
Peter Pon. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 3:46 am
In the case of Castelluccio v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:38 am
In dozens of studio emails unearthed by hackers, Sony executives; the director, Peter Landesman; and representatives of Mr. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 1:00 am
However, as explored in Bank of Scotland v Assessor for Edinburgh, contiguity is not the sole characteristic of geographical proximity. [read post]
8 Sep 2015, 3:42 pm
(As she notes, this is related to Peter Lee's argument that the Federal Circuit adopts formalistic rules to limit the extent to which generalist judges must grapple with complex technologies.) [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:05 am
In doing so, the author also analyses to what extent the decision is in line with the more recent judgment of the ECJ in Kolassa v Barclays Bank. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:05 pm
” [Ann Althouse] Citing First Amendment, federal court enjoins FDA from prohibiting truthful speech by drugmakers about off-label uses [WSJ, Alex Tabarrok (in recent years, federal government “has extracted billions of dollars in settlements from pharmaceutical firms for engaging in what appears to be constitutionally protected speech”), Beck and Sullivan, Drug & Device Law on Amarin v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:22 am
The Martens Judgment Daniel Mandrescu, Access to Leniency Programme Documents Based on the Transparency Regulation: The European Commission v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:28 am
Lefstin and Peter S. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 9:30 pm
You will recall that in Spiderman the movie, Uncle Ben informs Peter Parker that “with great power comes great responsibility. [read post]
30 Aug 2015, 8:00 am
In Aziz v. [read post]
27 Aug 2015, 6:00 am
In the 1996 decision of R v Hinchey, the Supreme Court went through this offence in detail and provided a breakdown of exactly what the Crown needed to prove in order to get a conviction. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 9:01 pm
The Supreme Court answered that question in the 1898 case of United States v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 4:05 pm
The Court of Appeals of British Columbia, in Equustek Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2015, 12:45 pm
Supreme Court Justice Harlan’s concurring opinion in Katz v. [read post]
