Search for: "Plaintiff(s)"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 178,381
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2024, 7:54 am
Yesterday’s emergency may become today’s dismissal or settlement. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:30 pm
Thus, the court granted the plaintiff’s motion. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:30 pm
It's not often that a case is thrown out because (1) the plaintiffs lack standing, (2) the case is moot, and (3) the case is not ripe. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:13 pm
Second, the Lexmark court says, 43(a) has a proximate cause requirement: a plaintiff suing under § [43](a) ordinarily must show economic or reputational injury flowing directly from the deception wrought by the defendant’s advertising; and that that occurs when deception of consumers causes them to withhold trade from the plaintiff. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 12:00 pm
The Court finds Plaintiff's Counsel's factual recitation concerning the origin of the Fictitious Case Citations to be truthful and accurate. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
Meanwhile, other plaintiffs brought the suit now known as Garcia v. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 10:01 am
” Given Delaware’s recent shift from its typically non-compete friendly stance, the Delaware Supreme Court’s ruling is beneficial for employers. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:54 am
One of the plaintiffs, Jane Doe, is a high school student whose teacher refused to address her by her correct first name. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:40 am
Several e-commerce sites were hit, first by hackers and then by plaintiffs’ lawyers. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 9:11 am
There the company challenged the AAA’s automatic fee rules. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 8:00 am
A judge is set to rule on the association’s motion in a court hearing set for late April. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 6:48 am
Under Lexmark, “a plaintiff suing under [the false advertising provision of the Lanham Act] ordinarily must show economic or reputational injury flowing directly from the deception wrought by the defendant’s advertising,” which is usually accomplished by showing that the defendant’s “deception of consumers cause[d] them to withhold trade from the plaintiff. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:35 am
This contractual obligation forms the basis of plaintiff’s instant claims of legal malpractice against defendants. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
The injured party Plaintiff’s Petition to Open was denied. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:40 am
The plaintiff’s problem on the failure-to-accommodate claim was that the defendant showed good faith by offering him comparable positions, but he summarily rejected them. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:27 am
It’s a close call. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:10 am
The district court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants, holding principally that plaintiff’s shout was not protected by the First Amendment because he did not know he was addressing a police officer, and that all of his claims were barred by the existence of probable cause–or at least arguable probable cause sufficient to give the officers qualified immunity–for plaintiff’s arrest So… expression is only… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:10 am
According to Plaintiffs, this allegedly “sham” process is what enabled the coercive and discriminatory treatment of the Class Members while their accommodation requests sat unadjudicated. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
The County’s policy of selective enforcement against the Plaintiffs, if left unchecked, will effectively shutter one of the now only two orthodox Jewish gathering spaces on the Big Island. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:30 am
The plaintiffs alleged that since the results disclosed were for a completed quarter, they should not be regarded as forward looking statements. [read post]
