Search for: "S. W. v. State"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 14,901
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
If substantial evidence supports the administrative tribunal's decision, a reviewing court may not substitute its judgment for that of the tribunal Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 2018 NY Slip Op 06964, In deciding Haug v State University of New York at Potsday [Potsdam], a case involving student discipline, the Court of Appeals commented on some issues relevant to the standard of proof required to support an administrative… [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am
Belmont (1937), United States v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 9:55 am
The issue in PDS Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 4:51 am
W 106 Dev. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
Examples of such obligations include the privacy and data security rules of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act (FACTA), the Internal Revenue Code and other tax laws, federal and state consumer debt and information, electronic crime, data security and identity theft statutes; federal and state trade secret and intellectual property laws; and others, for which violations often equal or substantially exceed the civil monetary penalty liability that commonly arise… [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 3:55 pm
Moreover, the $16 million resolution payment it’s just a small portion of the amount that Anthem has been required to shell out as a consequence of the breach. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:40 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm
On Friday, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) reversed the abatement in United States v. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:33 am
Nelson, 737 S.E.2d 550 (W. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 1:00 am
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm
On 9 to 11 October 2018 the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Bean and Flaux LJJ) heard the defendant’s appeal in the data protection case of Various Claimants v W M Morrison Supermarkets. [read post]
14 Oct 2018, 9:38 am
County Jail deputiesUnited States v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 1:24 pm
§ 103, we affirm.Footnote 1 of the caseIn a companion case decided today, Yeda Research& Development Co., v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 10:19 am
Campbell v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 2:54 am
Almosafer Travel and Tourism Company v. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:56 pm
Judge Matthew W. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 1:01 pm
” He acknowledged that “[w]e normally do, you’re right, put the duty to warn with the lowest cost avoider. [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 4:16 am
Yesterday the court heard argument in Nielsen v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 6:47 pm
Alice Corp. v. [read post]
