Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 4221 - 4240
of 10,422
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
3 Dec 2021, 12:20 pm
SharePatel v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 12:13 pm
It is also the opinion of The Supreme Court Of The United States(SCOTUS). [read post]
8 Jul 2013, 11:11 am
Press Oct., 2013) Katrina Kimport, Queering Marriage: Challenging Family Formation in the United States (Rutgers U. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:01 am
In United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 10:22 am
Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 404 (2000)(quoting United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 3:18 am
The Court agreed:To state a claim under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:44 pm
Do SEE ‘N SAY and THE FARMER SAYS really meet the statutory definition of being “widely recognized by the general consuming public of the United States as a designation of source of the goods or services of the mark’s owner”? [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 2:00 am
The most notorious of such cases (at present) is United Black Fund v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 12:40 pm
United States United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 7:09 pm
V Secret fame. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 3:36 pm
(See Mark Tushnet’s essay here.) [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Matter of Digital Forensics Unit v Records Access Officer 2023 NY Slip Op 01476 Decided on March 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Matter of Digital Forensics Unit v Records Access Officer 2023 NY Slip Op 01476 Decided on March 21, 2023 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 3:11 am
K 487 E3 S48 1996 Microeconomic predicates to law and economics / Mark Seidenfeld. [read post]
29 May 2008, 10:00 am
We posted Wyeth's principal brief in Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 12:33 am
Local 5 v. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
,SwitzerlandSwitzerland to introduce regulation for patent attorneys: (BLOG@IP::JUR)United Kingdom2007 Annual IP Crime Report released by UK-IPO: (BLOG@IP::JUR), (IAM)Patents Act 2004 (Commencement No. 4 and Transitional Provisions) Order 2007 has been published in order to put in place the final batch of changes to the UK Patents Act 1977 made by the Patents Act 2004: (IPKat)United StatesUnited States Supreme Court to clarify patent… [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Bunn v. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 6:34 am
I doubt whether any scholar could do as well.I will devote two subsequent posts to Justice Breyer's book, one to his discussion of United States v. [read post]
