Search for: "In re Doe" Results 4241 - 4260 of 107,416
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2016, 8:35 am
 Does legal practice result in modes of thought, a rapport with language and with reality, which manifest themselves in the works of legal writers? [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 5:45 am by Chris Williams
Louis libraries just in case they're too horny. [read post]
20 May 2024, 3:13 pm
It does seem at least a little bit wrong that someone committed to a hospital as a sexually violent predator should go 12 full years without a trial, no? [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 5:05 am by Jon Hyman
Does your social media policy educate about being “profersonal? [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 4:56 am
"Don't you want to decide for yourself just how much, if at all, you're going to sacrifice for the kids? [read post]
30 Jun 2003, 11:00 pm
On July 11, 2003, the Wisconsin Supreme Court re-opened a window to insurance coverage that it had slammed shut just nine years ago. [read post]
9 Apr 2020, 5:41 am
Thirty minutes later you’re walking out the door with a year-long agreement and a stomach ache because they had a twenty percent discount on memberships that day. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:39 pm
They’re harmless, although that, without doubt, does not justify them. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
But if you're one of those practitioners who does file in Israel from time to time -- and I suspect that readers of Patent Docs file in Israel at a higher rate than the general practitioner population -- you'll be pleased to know that the Israel PTO (ILPTO) recently proposed a change in patent examination practice that portends relief for beleaguered applicants: the ILPTO plans to tighten the criteria for... [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:06 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Otto, 312 16  F.2d 937, 940 (CCPA 1963). [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:02 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” In re Papesch, 315 F.2d 381, 391 (CCPA 1963). [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 9:46 pm by Sme
., August 24, 2016) (affirming denial of disability benefits and supplemental security income) *Cases marked with an asterisk are cases the 10th Circuit does not consider binding precedent except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:22 am by Ajay K. Mehrotra
Thanks to Sarah and Howard for re-inviting me to post about the American Bar Foundation (ABF). [read post]