Search for: "Little v. Little" Results 4241 - 4260 of 39,458
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Nov 2021, 12:09 pm
  Given our different backgrounds and life experiences, it might not be radically surprising if the qualities of the (many, many) Christians I've encountered in my life -- including but not limited to my entire family and extended set of relatives -- are perhaps a little different in the extent of their proselytizing than those at, say, the Bear Valley Bible Institute, or in certain conservative circles more likely to be frequented by Judge VanDyke than by me.One might perhaps… [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 7:51 am by John Jascob
The brief cites specific concerns with SPACs, including share value dilution and disproportionately high compensation paid to SPAC sponsors relative to risk (Assad v. [read post]
24 Nov 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  This seems to us a productive way to frame examination of skirmishes and battles in the aftermath of a Court decision that seemingly faced rather little by way of direct challenge. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 6:00 pm by Bill Marler
” Ignoring Salmonella in meat makes little, if any, sense. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am by Eric Segall
This blog post ignores the issue, however, because it has little bearing in the real world and the position is absurd, especially for a Justice who thought judges should try to ascertain the original public meaning of the ancient words of the United States Constitution by looking at sources such as the Federalist Papers.We should move on from the textualist-versus-purposivist battles because, to put it simply, judges should use all relevant information to try and ascertain the meaning of… [read post]
20 Nov 2021, 11:34 am by Eugene Volokh
To obtain emotional impact, orators employed the term without the strong justification, shading its meaning just a little. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 8:01 am
A little over a week ago, Michael Dorf wrote an article in Verdict regarding oral arguments in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]